Sunday, July 11, 2010

Essay Review: Toy Story 3


Toy Story 3 is about the only subject it could possibly be about: the departure of Andy to college and the present obsolescence and imminent demise of his toys. While Toy Story and Toy Story 2 touched on mortality even as they ultimately affirmed the importance of friendship, teamwork, and community, the third in this unlikeliest of trilogies embraces the fear of death head on. You've got a friend in me, indeed, but what happens if we're all going to the junkyard?

(warning: major spoilers ahead)


The Pixar approach of expertly blended and balanced elements of image, story, and tone is still largely in effect, but darkness sets in from the beginning. After an excellent opening sequence (which initially comes across as abandoning the series' theme of imagination in favor sequel-driven excess, until a clever reveal of when and how the scene was "built"), we are stunned to find that all the peripheral toys from the first two movies are gone, victim to breakdowns and yard sales. The most significant casualty is Bo Peep, and her emotional absence from the movie, save one early mention, is one of the film's few faults. The core group of toys - Woody, Buzz, Slinky Dog, Rex, Hamm, Mr. and Mrs. Potato Head, Jessie, Bullseye, Barbie, and the three-eyed aliens - face similar fates as Andy prepares to leave.

It becomes clear one reason the minor toys have been shelved is to make the plot mechanics of the Exodus from Andy's house easier, and the first segment of the movie strains to set their departure in motion. But the story takes off as the toys arrive at Sunnyside, a day care for children that is also a nursing home for toys (which also reverses the parent/child dynamic between children and toys; now the toys are the parents, tossed out of the house and put into a home by their ungrateful "kids"). It comes as no surprise that the initial good fortune at reaching the Sunnyside toy community, led by Lotso Huggin' Bear (voiced to perfection by Ned Beatty), gives way to ugly truths. The story develops along lines suggested by movies ranging from Cool Hand Luke to The Great Escape, before the toys take us on a journey to the abyss and back.

This is not to suggest the pace is unremittingly dark. The inventive Rube Goldberg-esque sequences the toys use to accomplish various goals continue to delight, and the introduction of a Ken doll to complement Barbie, a ticking time bomb of homophobia in the hands of lesser filmmakers, becomes the source of many of the film's funniest jokes. The interplay between Andy's toys, no matter where they find themselves, remains as enjoyable as ever, a credit to screenwriter Michael Arndt.


And yet we delve surprisingly deeper into some of the thorniest questions about the toy universe. The presence of such a large group of toys at Sunnyside opens questions of political power and class. Andy's room was small enough that Woody's leadership went mostly unexamined (although all three movies see him turned out by or abandoning his charges at one point); the derivation of his authority from his status as Andy's favorite toy is treated as a given. On the other hand, Lotso's source of power is depicted clearly: it is a combination of physical coercion, emotional manipulation, misinformation, and a clever power structure where the elites live in comfort while those on the outside, including "immigrant" toys, struggle amidst anarchy (a brief depiction of some of the elite toys gambling suggests the corruption inherent in this system).
His position atop the pyramid helps Lotso transcend his initial role as a variation on Stinky Pete from Toy Story 2 and makes him more savage, even as his past renders him more tragic. In any event, the filmmakers acknowledge these complications by slipping in a quote from Locke as a throwaway joke spoken by Barbie.

While overt mention of religion is avoided, else we see humans worshipped literally as gods, it inevitably turns up subtextually in a movie about loss and death. The masterful climactic scene can only be interpreted as salvation from damnation, as the toys' descent into the hellfire of the landfill incinerator is stopped and they are lifted into the sky by an unlikely but thematically perfect source. Not only does this uncomfortably remind us that there are some crises for which there is no Rube Goldberg-style fix, it brilliantly reverses the parody of organized religion from Toy Story, and, in the toys' simple acceptance of their fate before rescue, provides one of the most powerful movie moments in recent memory.

The Pixar house style of animation is starting to feel confining, but director Lee Unkrich uses several deft moves to enrich the bright, blocky style pioneered by Toy Story (which, to be fair, also contained the Frankenstein-ian horror of Sid's house). Sunnyside in particular is terrifyingly atmospheric, from selected use of wide angle shots to the depiction of key henchmen Big Baby and a cymbal-wielding monkey. The latter, in particular, could have been merely Orwellian, but the sickly green hue of the scenes in his lair is the frosting on the cinematographic cake. The score is similarly strong; a scene in Sunnyside set to music evoking "The Rite of Spring" shows Randy Newman is capable of more than sentimental songs.

The ending, while avoiding a contrived permanent return to Andy's house, nevertheless takes a step back from the movie's convictions by giving the toys a new owner (who, while female, shares Andy's style of play). End-credit scenes of a reformed Sunnyside suggest only a small change could have produced a completely authentic finale. Still, perhaps after all they've been through, the toys deserve some element of a fairy tale ending. And it is no accident they spend the movie trying to break out of confining boxes and end it being played with -- outside and in the open.

In the end, Toy Story 3 leaves us with two enduring messages. All the resourcefulness and friendship and community in the world will not always save the day, not forever forestall the end of existence. But no matter what destination lies ahead, it matters how we get there, and the only way to make the journey is to make it together. The story of Toy Story 3 is life and death, a grand adventure, and an affirmation of the ties that bind. It is a wonderful story.

3 comments:

Raymond Shaw said...

First, I apologize for any vibes of pretentiousness given off by this review (and I only added essay to the title because it had so many spoilers that calling it a review would have felt silly). Perhaps I went a little overboard, but I love each movie in the Toy Story trilogy and sincerely feel they can be viewed on many different levels.

Second, I saw this in theaters, and I have a love/hate relationship with trailers, so I present a trailer reaction lightning round:

The Sorcerer's Apprentice - If you missed the opening "from Jerry Bruckheimer" credit, a red sports car in the first five seconds reminds you you're miles away from the classic Fantasia short this is presumably "based" on. Cinematic abomination number one. RUN JAY BARUCHEL RUN

Tangled - Rapunzel, in the hip, self-aware, CGI style. On the plus side, Rapunzel seems pretty bad ass. On the down side, some idiot man is the focus. Not even Disney can have female protagonists anymore?

Despicable Me - The teaser from last summer (with the Egyptian temples) was awesome. Now it looks visually interesting but with a disappointingly cookie-cutter story about family and redemption. Still the best of the bunch.

The Smurf Movie (2011) - Teaser only. I did not see a Jerry Bruckheimer credit or a red sports car, but I know they're there somewhere. Cinematic abomination number two.

Legend of the Guardians: The Owls of Ga'Hoole - I had to look up the full title on IMDB. The Lord of the Rings, with owls. I swore Elijah Wood even voiced the main character, but IMDB helped me out on that too (it's Jim Sturgess...he was cheaper). Directed by Zack Snyder?!?

Mega Mind: Wasn't it funny how Shrek cleverly "sent up" fairy tales? Wouldn't you like to see that for superhero movies?!? The trailer doesn't tip its hand entirely to the usual DreamWorks crap, but the signs are there. If it's a straight comedy it has a small chance of being funny.

The Chronicles of Narnia: The Voyage of the Dawn Treader - The plan to turn C.S. Lewis' series of books into the next cinematic Harry Potter faltered after the producers realized no one has read any of the books after "The Lion, the Witch, and the Wardrobe". Oops. But they're trying again. I liked the BBC's adaptation of this one from my childhood, so I am mildly interested.

McGraw said...

What strikes me about Toy Story 3 is, as Ray correctly points out, the "weight" of the themes involved. Pixar films have been largely successful because they tell compelling stories aimed at children, but include enough adult humor to keep parents and teenagers entertained. I watched Toy Story 3 thinking that the opposite was true; indeed, TS3 is an adult-themed film that needed a few reminders that young children might be in the audience. It makes Toy Story 2 seem like, yes, child's play in comparison.

My few frustrations with the film center around the (at times) awkward attempts to blunt the story's inherent darker subtext. The side story of Barbie and Ken (complete with easy metrosexual jokes at the doll's expense) seems entirely out of line with the rest of the scenes from daycare. Similarly, converting Buzz to his "Flamenco" equivalent was a total misfire. And while I recognize the reasons these slapstick elements were added to the script, they seem so misplaced compared to everything else unfolding. I would have liked to have gone deeper down the rabbit's hole, though I did not expect TS3 to take me there in the first place.

Toy Story 3 is a film about the fight against nihilism. Toys are the perfect subject for a reflection of the human condition because they are both transient and fragile. They are seemingly disposable and replaceable despite the value they are given in our society. And while the gang is "reincarnated" at the trilogy's conclusion, I couldn't help feeling a certain emptiness for the inevitably of it all.

Raymond Shaw said...

That's a good point - the film is in some ways so dark that the "business as usual" parts feel almost out of place. Even in WALL*E it's not as jarring because we're temporally removed from the tragedy.

On the other hand, I think the balance is still upheld. I really liked Ken and Barbie, although I agree Spanish Buzz was pointless and ineffective. The other thing that helps is the back and forth between the toys - it's not always laugh out loud but it keeps the movie well balanced, even when they're in a dire situation.